Top Navigation Bar

Listen
http://www.americangazette.org/radio_shows.html

Our Mission

Big government is not simply the size of the budget, or the number of federal programs; it is the role the federal government plays in our daily lives.

We at the Lincoln Heritage Institute will not sit idly by and allow bloated bureaucracies, budensome tax policies, a failing public education system, and out of control regulatory system, and a growing disregard for the rule of law to become an accepted way of life

We have as our purpose, through public education, the revitalization and preservation of our traditional political, social, commercial, and legal environment in which the only limits to achievement are individual ability and effort.

 

 

Roberts Still May Replace Rehnquist

from NewsMax.com

Judge John Roberts was George Bush’s first choice to replace ailing Supreme Court Justice Chief William Rehnquist, NewsMax’s Insider Report has learned.

But Rehnquist’s stubborn desire to stay on the court – and some hardball politics in Washington, may have forced Bush's hand to nominate Roberts to replace retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.

A top Washington insider tells NewsMax that the vetting process for picking a new chief justice and other potential nominations had begun long ago.

And the prevailing wisdom was that Rehnquist, in ill health, would retire first, or at the same time O’Connor announced her resignation.

At the top of the list to replace Rehnquist was his former clerk, John Roberts.

The Bush administration loved the selection. Roberts is a solid conservative who has impeccable legal credentials and no trail of controversy. He is also young and as Chief Justice could dominate the high court for decades.

If both Rehnquist’s position and O’Connor’s had opened, Bush could have also nominated a more moderate associate justice to balance Roberts. The favorite for that slot was Bush’s long-time friend and current Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales.

But the veteran Washington player Rehnquist is believed to have forced Bush’s hand.

By stubbornly declining to resign, Rehnquist forced Bush to pick a conservative to the court. Had Bush gone with a moderate like Gonzales, he most assuredly would have faced the wrath of socially conservative
voters in the 2006 midterm election.

Most pundits acknowledge that the President was re-elected primarily because of the efforts of social conservatives, who came to the polls in overwhelming numbers this past November.

Exit polls had indicated that moral issues ranked as the most important factor influencing votes, and pre-election Gallup polling revealed that 25% of the President’s support came from self-defined single-issue
pro-life voters.

Our Washington insider says that as of a week ago, Bush was still strongly leaning toward selecting Gonzalez.

But Karl Rove’s office placed a number of calls to several leading evangelical and Catholic leaders who said such a choice would be opposed by Bush’s core voters.

The source also says that Roberts, once confirmed as associate justice, is still the favorite to replace Rehnquist.

With an expected confirmation under his belt, Roberts would easily sail through for a second confirmation process to replace Rehnquist, but that would again leave open the “swing” vote O’Connor created by retiring.


Lincoln Heritage Institute lhi@wmis.net
620 Hall Street, Eaton Rapids, MI 48827
In Pennsylvania, 603 N. 3rd. St., Harrisburg, Pa.
Box 656 Main St., Pleasant Valley, NY, 12569 Fax (517) 663-5245