Top Navigation Bar

Listen
http://www.americangazette.org/radio_shows.html

Our Mission

Big government is not simply the size of the budget, or the number of federal programs; it is the role the federal government plays in our daily lives.

We at the Lincoln Heritage Institute will not sit idly by and allow bloated bureaucracies, budensome tax policies, a failing public education system, and out of control regulatory system, and a growing disregard for the rule of law to become an accepted way of life.

We have as our purpose, through public education, the revitalization and preservation of our traditional political, social, commercial, and legal environment in which the only limits to achievement are individual ability and effort.

 

 

Statement on Supreme Court Ruling
on Global Warming in
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

Amy Ridenour, president of The National Center for Public Policy Research, released this statement today following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency:

“The Supreme Court’s decision is a victory for the bad guys in the battle over whether the American people will be governed by accountable elected officials or unaccountable judges. Unable to convince the Senate to vote upon, let alone ratify, the Kyoto global warming treaty, the left has adopted the Kyoto-by-stealth strategy of asking judges to force its version of science into the pocketbooks of the American people.

“Shame on them. And shame on the five Justices who agreed to do so today.

“We learn from Justice Stevens today that carbon dioxide is ‘the most important…greenhouse gas.’ Science cannot confirm the Justice’s confident statement. The role of water vapor, the most plentiful greenhouse gas, is not yet understood. Nor is the role of carbon dioxide understood. Such uncertainty, among many others, is the reason scientists annually request and spend several billion dollars of funds supplied by hardworking U.S. taxpayers for research into climate change. Can the taxpayers now expect relief? After all, the Justices have spoken; the verdict is in.

“We shall see how many groups on the political left today ask: ‘How many peer-reviewed papers has Justice Stevens published?’

“U.S. policies relating to the alleged threat of global warming should, as Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito said in their dissent, be determined by the Congress and the Chief Executive. As the dissenting Justices also observed, ‘[Global warming] is not a problem that…has escaped the attention of policymakers in the Executive and Legislative Branches of our Government, who continue to consider regulatory, legislative and treaty-based means of addressing global climate change.’

“The Supreme Court should have stayed out of the way. The legislative and executive branches are empowered by the Constitution with the duty of setting environmental policies, and, unlike our rapacious judicial branch, also are accountable to the American people.”


Lincoln Heritage Institute • lhi@wmis.net
620 Hall Street, Eaton Rapids, Michigan 48827 • Fax: (517) 663-5245
Pennsylvania: 603 North Third Street, Harrisburg, PA 17113
New York: Box 656 Main Street, Pleasant Valley, NY 12569